Fun with harmony: Vater unser

November 16th, 2008

Now that I have installed the WordPress audio plug-in for my blog, I thought I would post some of my music that I’ve churned out in the last year or so.

I’ve enjoyed taking old melodies, many of them old Lutheran chorales used by J.S. Bach, and harmonizing them. Since many of Martin Luther’s melodies were adaptations of gregorian chant, a lot of them have a quasi-modal feel to them which makes for interesting challenges for harmonization, since standard diatonic harmonic progressions aren’t readily apparent.

Some background info

I write everything away from the keyboard, usually at a desk or kitchen table. A few were even written on an airplane. Ha ha. Then afterwards I play them through on the piano to make sure there are no surprises. This chorale, Vater unser im Himmelreich, was my first attempt at harmonizing a given melody. I wrote it about a year ago at my parents’ house over the holidays.

This was quite a bit of time-consuming work. For each file, I had to copy the notes from my paper manuscript book into the computer program (Sibelius student edition), then export a MIDI file into GarageBand to change the sound quality, then send them from GarageBand into iTunes so I can convert them to .mp3 format, and then upload them to my web server so they appear on my blog posts. Then for the music score itself, I take screenshots, change them to .gif format, and then upload them to my web server. Apparently I would have to upgrade to the full version of Sibelius to be able to export images directly and save myself lots of time. Grr.

Also, I don’t yet know how to record my own playing from my electric piano into my computer, so these chorales are stiffly played by the computer. I didn’t know how to make it breathe between phrases so after “Vater unser” I started inserting rests at the end of a phrase to produce a break in the line.

Enough already! Get on with the music!

Anyway, on to the first chorale, Vater unser im Himmelreich, written by Martin Luther in 1539.

Vater unser im Himmelreich,
Der du uns alle heißest gleich
Brüder sein und dich rufen an
Und willst das Beten von uns ha’n:
Gib, daß nicht bet’ allein der Mund,
hilf, daß es geh’ aus Herzensgrund.

Our Father in the heavenly kingdom
who calls us all directly
to be brothers and call on you
and wants to have prayers from us:
Grant that we pray not only from the mouth,
Help that it goes out of our deepest heart.

First, here is the melody alone. I made files of just the melody first since my harmonization alters and embellishes the original melody.

Vater unser melody
Click to enlarge in a new window

And here is my harmonization:

Vater unser harmony
Click to enlarge in a new window

I would like to send props to Deborah Jamini, my music teacher here in NY. There’s no way I could write convincing four-part harmony with relative ease away from the keyboard when I was in college. Her approach to teaching harmony and theory is so far superior to my courses in college that there’s just no comparison.

Secure hunks

November 11th, 2008

According to the Wall Street Journal, President-elect Obama is keeping the current security policies mostly intact.

Mr. Obama is being advised largely by a group of intelligence professionals, including some who have supported Republicans, and centrist former officials in the Clinton administration. They say he is likely to fill key intelligence posts with pragmatists.

“He’s going to take a very centrist approach to these issues,” said Roger Cressey, a former counterterrorism official in the Clinton and Bush administrations.

Whew. This was a big concern for me, living in what is probably the #1 terrorism target in the US. Trying to stop a terrorist plot as it is already happening is completely unrealistic. It would be extremely easy to sneak some sort of bomb or biological weapon into the subway, for example, since there are no security checkpoints or baggage search. So the only realistic way to stop these plots is before they happen, which means intelligence gathering.

When democrats around here have criticized Bush’s intelligence policies, I’ve just shook my head, thinking these people are unbelievably naïve. It’s not like there were only a small handful of crazy people who wanted to hurt us, and now they’re all dead so we can live happily ever after. So when it looked like Obama was going to be the next president, I was genuinely apprehensive about living in the #1 terror target while the government puts naïve ideology ahead of safety. Reading that Obama is taking a pragmatic, centrist approach instead of throwing the baby out with the bath water is a great relief.

Thierry Escaich improvisation

November 7th, 2008

I just installed a WordPress (the blogging software that runs this page) plugin that lets you embed audio clips in a blog post, so I thought I’d test it out.

Here is a clip from the aforementioned CD I bought recently of French organist Thierry Escaich’s live improvisations. It is a set of four variations on the Lutheran chorale “Herzliebster Jesu” (1630).

Herzliebster Jesu, was hast du verbrochen,
Daß man ein solch scharf Urteil hat gesprochen?
Was ist die Schuld? In was für Missetaten bist du geraten?

Beloved Jesus, what crime have you committed
that they have pronounced so hard a sentence?
What is your guilt, into what misdeeds have you fallen?

Here is the chorale set by J.S. Bach in the St. Matthew Passion (1729), performed here under the direction of Nikolaus Harnoncourt:

And here are the chorale variations improvised live by Thierry Escaich:

From the liner notes:

With a text by Johann Heermann and music by Johann Crüger, Herzliebster Jesu is one of the most beautiful Lutheran chorales, expressing the anguished stupefaction of the crowd before the judgement condemning Christ. Bach illustrated it twice in his Neumeister Chorales for organ and twice in each of his St. John and St. Matthew Passions, whereas Brahms drew a magnificent chorale-prelude from it. Thierry Escaich presents the melody in all the splendour of a four-part harmonization before subjecting it to four variations. The first is a fast fugato on the flue chorus; the subject is the head of the theme, which appears in augmentation on the pedal, reinforced by the reeds. Next comes an ornamented variation in a supple ternary rhythm, with the melody going from the cornet to the low register of the trumpet as in a cantata duet, then a trio where a voluble flute descant enlaces the chorale, stated in the oboe. The improvisation concludes with a brilliant fugue on the head of the chorale, in a gigue rhythm. In the thick of the contrapuntal development, the chorale theme makes a conspicuous entrance int he midst of polyphony that is already rich, crowning the improvisation in grandiose fashion.

I get goosebumps when I listen to this, knowing that Mr. Escaich can improvise at such a high level on themes presented to him just moments before on stage.

Bill Joy for national CTO

November 6th, 2008

I saw an article today that President-elect Obama is planning to create a position of Chief Technology Officer of the United States, and that Bill Joy is one of the names circulating as a potential candidate for that spot. That’s pretty exciting to me. Information technology is one of my areas of interest, and obviously one of the important gears that moves our society, so I think it’s great that we would finally be getting someone in charge of this who actually knows what he’s talking about, instead of leaving it only to a bunch of politicians whose VCRs have probably been flashing 12:00 since the ’80s. For the last several years I have cringed when topics like net neutrality come up and the people making such important decisions don’t really understand what is at stake, and lacking an understanding of the issue, just default back to their generic philosophy of “the less government involvement, the better.”

For those who may not know who Bill Joy is, he is one of the fathers of the modern computer age. He helped write BSD Unix while at Berkeley, co-founded Sun Microsystems, made big contributions to the TCP/IP stack which is basically used by everything that connects to the internet, was one of the primary developers of the Java programming language, and also was a primary developer of the SPARC microprocessor. A few years ago he retired from Sun and now works at the granddaddy of venture capital firms, Kleiner-Perkins.

Bill Joy has been an advocate of open standards in technology. This is very important to be because it is much better for the consumer and also seems to be better for the progress of technology. There are two main approaches to standards and compatibility: one is to agree on a standard and compete on the implementation of that standard, and the other is to compete on the standard itself and try to make your product incompatible with everything else to force a monopoly.

One example everyone can relate to is web browsers. Remember a few years ago when Microsoft and Netscape were fighting the “browser wars” and you would frequently see sites that only worked with one or the other? That was a headache for consumers and a total nightmare for web developers. HTML, the language used for making web pages, is supposed to be a standardized language agreed upon by the W3C World Wide Web Consortium, so that it works the same with any browser or computing platform. That transparent compatibility is indeed one of the beauties of the internet. But Netscape and Microsoft wanted to make everyone use their product, so instead of adhering to compatibility standards and competing on the implementation (making pages load more efficiently, making the interface more friendly, allowing for more options, etc.), they tried to be incompatible with each other in order to monopolize the web. Microsoft is still a prime offender in this approach to competition, dubbed Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. The main reason you don’t see those “this page requires browser xyz” buttons anymore is not because Microsoft started playing nice (Internet Explorer is still the worst offender for standards compliance) but because web developers often have to create two versions of their pages: one for IE and one for everything else (Firefox, Opera, Safari, etc.).

An example of the other approach is email. Email has compatibility standards used by every client. I can send an email from my Mac using Apple Mail, and you can read that email using whatever program you want, whether it be Microsoft Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird, or even a web app like Gmail. You know they will all work together transparently and so you pick the program with the best features for your daily use. Everyone wins.

So that’s why I think open standards are so important, and that’s why I’m excited to see someone like Bill Joy as a possible Chief Technology Officer for the United States. Woo hoo!

Thierry Escaich is THE MAN

October 23rd, 2008

Thierry Escaich: Organ Improvisations

I know nobody who reads my blog probably cares about this, but I feel compelled to post this anyway. I just got a new CD of Thierry Escaich’s Organ Improvisations in the mail today from Amazon. I’ve only listened to the first CD so far, but let me just say that Mr. Escaich is easily the most talented improvisor I have ever heard, bar none. I have never heard a music performer in any genre who plays with more explosive excitement. He seems to be a bottomless fount of creative ideas bursting forth from his finger tips (and feet!). His playing is full of energy, vitality, and intensity.

Here’s what the press has to say about Mr. Escaich’s live improvisations (these are reviews of his concerts, not this CD):

“Thierry Escaich improvised works of phenomenal inventiveness…”

“The improvisations he developed from themes presented to him onstage were as cohesive and complete as large-scale compositions.” - Cleveland Plain Dealer

“One of the most fascinating chameleons of his generation: to believe so, you have to hear Thierry Escaich improvising live, in any form and from all the styles you can imagine. To an instrumental mastery with an ease that is very close to infallibility, adds, in this really special musician, an escalation of outstanding mental faculties that enable him to muse at his best with the whole of the western music resources”. - Diapason

On the first CD he improvises in a wide variety of styles and genres, with improvisations based on everything from gregorian chant to German chorales, from silent film scenes to selections from Homer's The Odyssey. He improvises fugues at breakneck speeds, including a double fugue on the chorale tune O Gott, du frommer Gott (O God, you righteous God, a prayer asking for God’s grace in daily life). Mr. Escaich’s styles run the gamut from the Baroque period to his own modern idiom.

All tracks were recorded during live concerts, so no second takes or editing magic.

Twice I have had the privilege of hearing him accompany worship services live, once in Paris and once in Washington, D.C. What an asset a skilled improvisor can be to the service. He can improvise the prelude/postlude/offertory on the melodies sung by the congregation that day. He can improvise introductions to the hymns as well as interludes between verses. He can improvise a different harmonization for each verse, depending on what types of music best suit the text. I remember at St. Étienne-du-Mont in Paris where I attended the Sunday evening service, he was playing the prelude based on the first hymn to be sung by the congregation, in a style somewhat reminiscent of Bach’s organ transcriptions of Vivaldi’s string concertos. The music was progressing, slowly building in intensity and excitement as the start of the service drew nearer, with short segments of the melody appearing here and there while the accompaniment galloped along. The intensity grew, and then there was a small bell that rang to signal to everyone that worship was getting close to starting and it was time to stand up. Right about the time that the bell rang, the organ prelude ramped up and modulated (I think) to the subdominant with a sequence of dancing, dotted rhythms. It was so fitting to what was happening as we stood up to anticipate the start of the service, I had goosebumps (partly to do with the unique, breathtaking architecture of the church). Then, after earlier in the prelude hearing isolated segments of the melody we were about to sing, suddenly the organ registration becomes more expansive and we hear the full melody soaring above the busy accompaniment (still galloping along) in long notes soloed out on a trumpet stop. Absolutely magnificent. Then the prelude draws to a close and the organ changes gears to accompany the congregation. Wow. Someday I want to be able to do something like that (probably not with the same level of studied craftsmanship of Mr. Escaich, but still) for a congregation. That is my ultimate goal for my music studies.

I found a brief clip on YouTube. This looks to be a postlude from one of the services at St. Étienne-du-Mont. This is his own modern style, but rest assured he can assume the style of pretty much anything from western music history.


Sarah Palin addendum

October 18th, 2008

I just read an incisive article about Sarah Palin by Peggy Noonan in the Wall Street Journal. Here is the key section:

Her supporters accuse her critics of snobbery: Maybe she’s not a big “egghead” but she has brilliant instincts and inner toughness. But what instincts? “I’m Joe Six-Pack”? She does not speak seriously but attempts to excite sensation—”palling around with terrorists.” If the Ayers case is a serious issue, treat it seriously. She is not as thoughtful or persuasive as Joe the Plumber, who in an extended cable interview Thursday made a better case for the Republican ticket than the Republican ticket has made. In the past two weeks she has spent her time throwing out tinny lines to crowds she doesn’t, really, understand. This is not a leader, this is a follower, and she follows what she imagines is the base, which is in fact a vast and broken-hearted thing whose pain she cannot, actually, imagine. She could reinspire and reinspirit; she chooses merely to excite. She doesn’t seem to understand the implications of her own thoughts.

No news conferences? Interviews now only with friendly journalists? You can’t be president or vice president and govern in that style, as a sequestered figure. This has been Mr. Bush’s style the past few years, and see where it got us. You must address America in its entirety, not as a sliver or a series of slivers but as a full and whole entity, a great nation trying to hold together. When you don’t, when you play only to your little piece, you contribute to its fracturing.

In the end the Palin candidacy is a symptom and expression of a new vulgarization in American politics. It’s no good, not for conservatism and not for the country. And yes, it is a mark against John McCain, against his judgment and idealism.

From what I've seen of her, I would agree with this assessment. She seems to share Obama's gift of rousing emotions with no substance. I've watched interviews with her where she dodges questions left and right, and even flat out changes the subject when pressed. The caricature of her on Saturday Night Live isn't too far off the mark.

The list of better VP choices than Sarah Palin is a long one. Even beyond the big names, I'm sure there are plenty of diamonds in the rough. But I don't think Sarah Palin is one of them. She was chosen for her gender, age, and conservative political stance, probably in that order, and for political expediency rather than her ability to helm the nation.

This choice Palin by McCain has neutralized many criticisms against Obama. "Where's the beef?" "No experience." Except Obama actually comes across as presidential, while Palin comes across as a folksy "hockey mom" from nowhere. I am not alone in being turned off by her colloquialism.

And judging by the campaigns themselves, Obama is also the winner in political acumen. I recently came across an older article on conservative analyst Dick Morris’ website from late February comparing Obama’s handling of his campaign to Hillary Clinton’s handling of hers. Mr. Morris makes the case that Obama’s strategies to everything from fundraising methods to his response to negative TV ads were nothing short of brilliant compared to Hillary Clinton. The article concludes with this:

Will he be a good president? If he is half as skillful in serving as he has been in running, he can’t miss.

I think you could make a similar point about Obama’s campaign vs. McCain’s. Obama may be wrong in his views on many issues, in my opinion, but in terms of pure leadership ability and political acumen, he appears to have McCain beat hands down. This type of judgment is an important skill for the president to have as he meets with other world leaders to position America favorably on the international scene. McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin (who, speaking of astuteness in international affairs, didn’t even possess a passport until last year) is one of many lapses in judgment by his campaign.

McCain > Obama/Biden > Palin

Sarah Palin

October 2nd, 2008

I’ve been thinking about McCain’s choice of a running mate recently. It seems to me that she was primarily chosen not for her ability to lead the country should McCain be incapacitated, but for her ability to complement McCain’s support demographic. I find it a bit unnerving when the best thing her supporters (even brilliant analysts like Dick Morris) can say about her is what a great choice she was for helping McCain get elected, how she’s going to pull in votes from former Hillary Clinton supporters and Republicans for whom McCain isn’t conservative enough, how she’s broken the monopoly that Democrats have on feminism, and so on. The choice of Palin also reflects poorly on McCain because it shows that he is willing to put his pragmatic goal of getting elected ahead of what is best for the country. It makes his “Country First” slogan ring hollow to me.

Her qualifications and experience in national (much less international) politics are lacking. She was mayor of a city with a population smaller than many high schools (5500 people during her stint as mayor), and then she was governor of the third smallest state in the union (by population, even though some of her supporters have aggrandized her qualifications by saying she was governor of “the largest state,” meaning geographically). The fact that she didn’t even have a passport until 2006 (and didn’t venture outside of North America until 2007) should be disturbing to anyone. Can someone who until last year had no interest in seeing anything outside the US be competent as the Commander in Chief of the most powerful nation in the world? And living in proximity to Russia doesn’t qualify her as an international political leader any more than my living down the street from a hospital qualifies me as a neurosurgeon.

There is also the practical issue of leaders from certain cultures not respecting a woman. Should Palin become Commander in Chief, would leaders in the middle east respect and deal with her on the same level as they would a man? I know that’s not politically correct, but like it or not, the reality is that even today some cultures treat women with less dignity than cattle.

I also find her religious beliefs a little disturbing. She spent the first 38 years of her life in an Assembly of God church that puts a lot of emphasis on the “end times” and direct personal revelation from God. As a Christian, I know that in the ultimate sense we’re on the “same team.” But I very much disagree with both of these issues, and as a member of society, I’m not sure I want someone who thinks we are in the “end times” and has a tendency to see world events through that lens, and who also believes in direct personal revelation from God, to have the codes to our nuclear arsenal. I believe that scripture is supposed to be our means of revelation from God, and that that revelation does not include specific things like “God told me to buy a Toyota.” Instead, James 1:5 says that we should ask God for wisdom in decision making. The Bible also says that we should not worry about the “end times” except to be vigilant in our relationship with God. We aren’t to focus our attention on speculation about the “end times” and trying to see the news in that light. The end times obsession we see in certain circles of Christianity is both unhealthy and unbiblical. (Some might say the views of her former church don’t matter, but it would be hypocritical to make a big deal over Jeremiah “God damn America” Wright and then dismiss Palin’s beliefs and associations as unimportant.)

All of this wouldn’t be so critical if John McCain weren’t so old. This election, the VP choice matters more than usual. Actuaries have pegged McCain’s odds at 1 in 4 for not finishing a second term. So there is a not insignificant chance that Sarah Palin could be the Commander in Chief of the world’s superpower. I don’t like Obama, and I think McCain/Palin is the lesser of two evils, but I sure wish he had chosen someone more qualified for the job than Sarah Palin.

Health - Hassle = Hunk

September 30th, 2008

I recently got one of Jack LaLanne’s Power Juicers and thought I’d post a few of the things that I’ve discovered about making vegetable and fruit juices and smoothies. Juicing and making smoothies are two ways to get a lot of health benefits without much effort.

Sparkling water can add a nice texture to juices. Today I made a juice of 3 carrots, 1 pear, 1 apple, 1 kiwi, and 1 lime, and then added some sparkling water after I was finished. I was surprised how much it added to the experience. I’ve also heard that you can make yourself some ginger ale by juicing some ginger root with other vegetables (apples, pears, maybe some other things) and adding sparkling water to that.

Spinach is incredibly healthy, but most people aren’t wild about eating it. I’ve found an easy way to get a big boost in fresh spinach intake is to throw several large handfuls into a smoothie and blend it up. It makes almost no difference in the taste, only changes the color of the smoothie to green.

Another thing I like to do in smoothies is to throw in a bunch of frozen berries and then add some extra virgin coconut oil (Barleans is a good brand) on top of the frozen berries and let it sit there for a little while before starting the blender. The coconut oil will freeze and turn semi-solid, and then when it gets chopped up in the blender it makes for a nice texture in the smoothie. You get lots of little cold bits of frozen coconut oil that you can feel when you bite down.

Watermelon is an awesome ingredient that might be easy to overlook. I made a really good juice recently that had watermelon, cantaloupe, cucumber, and maybe some orange juice and/or celery (can’t remember exactly). Watermelon is also great in smoothies, but the nice thing about the juicer is you don’t have to pick out all the seeds first. (Watermelon and spinach are both very alkaline foods, so they’re great for getting your pH balanced.)

Here’s a smoothie that I make a lot. It’s an antioxidant bonanza! Everyone who has tried it so far has liked it.

1 banana
1 handful of frozen berries (blueberries, blackberries, mixed berries, anything is good)
1 tablespoon of extra virgin coconut oil on top of the frozen berries
1-2 fistfuls of fresh spinach
several fresh or frozen strawberries
1 teaspoon of flax oil
1-2 raw eggs (optional)
1 teaspoon of honey (optional)
curcumin powder (optional)
several chunks of watermelon (optional)

Or another variation is to make a pineapple/coconut milk smoothie:

1 banana
1/2 can of pineapple chunks (without sugary syrup)
1 can coconut milk
1 handful of frozen blackberries
1 handful of frozen peaches
1 tablespoon extra virgin coconut oil
1 teaspoon flax oil

Stay healthy!

He’s back!

September 15th, 2008

Well, after 20 months or so with virtually no use of my hands thanks to a smorgasbord of repetitive strain injuries resulting from my former job as a computer programmer, I’m now pretty much back in action.

What finally did the trick for me was reading a book that my awesome physical therapist, Lisa Sattler, had recommended to me. The book is called Rapid Recovery from Back and Neck Pain by Fred Amir. It is based on the work of Dr. John Sarno, professor at NYU, on the mind-body connection as it relates to back pain. I don’t have back pain, but the general principles still apply. The book is really amazing, and if anyone knows someone with chronic inexplicable pain, this book is certainly worth a try. $14 for a paperback is slightly cheaper than a trip to the doctor’s office!

Being unable to do pretty much anything with my hands for 20 months had its moments of extreme frustration, especially since it didn’t seem to be improving until very recently. In fact I even seemed to be moving backwards at times. It’s extremely frustrating when you’re trying to make the best use of your time that you can, and then even those limited activities start setting off sharp stabbing pain in your wrists.

Music Theory

The bright side is that I was able to make huge headway in my knowledge of music theory and in my general musicianship skills (sight-singing, ear training, &c.). I kept up my music lessons with my teacher all throughout my injury, and I also spent thousands of hours doing anything I could to practice music in my head. I did everything except the playing of the keyboard:

  • doing harmonic analysis in my head
  • sight-singing my way through music from the library
  • practicing counting rhythms
  • practicing thinking in difficult keys (keys with 5 or more sharps or flats)
  • drilling scale degrees (for example looking at a piece in g minor, and looking at every note on the page and saying what scale degree of the key it is, e.g. here is the V chord, D major, which is comprised of scale degrees 5, 7, and 2; now here is the ii6/5 chord, which is 4 in the bass, and 1, 2, and 6 in the upper voices, and so on)
  • looking at the keyboard and picturing how the different scales and chords look on the keyboard and remembering how they feel under the hand
  • practicing analyzing music by ear

The exciting thing is that, after 20 months without touching a keyboard, I lost almost nothing in my playing ability. In fact, my sight-reading actually improved and is much better than it was in college. All of my hands-free work didn’t have much in the way of tangible benefits at the time (at least that others could see, although I could feel the benefits all along), but I knew it would all pay off when I could finally start putting the pieces together. Throughout my life as a musician, the “muscle memory” part of playing was always much, much stronger for me than the cognitive processing of what I was playing. I would learn repertoire almost purely by muscle memory without understanding bigger patterns. By not having the use of my hands, I was forced to work exclusively on my weak area, which was the cognitive understanding of what I was playing.

To say I was concentrating on theoretical understanding may sound like impractical pie in the sky, but music theory is immensely practical. Spoken language is a useful analogy. Imagine if someone told you to memorize a speech in Russian. You would be forced to memorize syllable to syllable, focusing on particular things like “round your lips more here, put your tongue against the back of your top front teeth here and exhale quickly, make this vowel longer” and so on. That is how it is to play music without understanding what is happening in terms of music theory. Now imagine how much easier it would be to learn to recite Russian if you took 2 years and actually studied the language itself instead of this or that particular speech. With enough practice, you could even read Russian with no preparation! Is learning Russian grammar and vocabulary impractical pie in the sky then? Of course not. Neither is focusing effort on music theory.

Psychology

Another weak area in which I was able to make significant headway is in the psychological aspect of public performance. I have always had major difficulty with what athletes refer to as “choking.” If, when the moment of truth arrives and all eyes are on you, you blow it with a stupid mistake, that is choking. In fact, I remember thinking in college that I probably couldn’t even play a simple five note scale without screwing up if there was enough pressure.

Starting before my hand injury, I had become interested in sports psychology. This was spurred by two things: 1) my frustration with how my music career had turned out after college and trying to figure out what went wrong, and 2) my experiences playing the video game Halo. The former piqued my curiosity, and the latter pointed me in the right direction for some answers. Back in 2004 I had made friends online with two guys who were probably the two best players in the world for the PC version of Halo (chumpp and WerD). That was an eye opening experience for getting a glimpse inside the world of someone who is the best at what they do. I remember talking to chumpp on instant messenger one night and him telling me why he was so good. He said he always paid attention to why things were happening. If he was playing well, he thought about what it was he was doing that was causing him to be successful. And if he was doing poorly, he thought about why he was doing poorly. This may sound obvious in hindsight, but it was fundamentally different from my approach to life up to that point. I had always thought that the way to become successful was to just try really hard, and if you only got so far by trying as hard as you could, well, then I guess it just wasn’t going to happen! But after talking and playing with chumpp and WerD for a few months, I saw that people who are the best at what they do use their brains. It’s the difference between “If at first you don’t succeed, try harder” and “If at first you don’t succeed, change your approach to the problem.”

Another breakthrough in my dabbling in sports psychology came a couple of years later, when I took a few lessons with pro Halo player Tom Taylor (”Tsquared”). In my first lesson, he asked me how I felt about using the power weapons (items that are in short supply but give you a big advantage over your opponent, such as the rocket launcher). I told him I didn’t feel comfortable using them because whenever I would pick one up all I could think was, “Oh man, I’d better not screw this up. If I miss with the rocket launcher, then I’ll look stupid and put the rockets into the opponents’ possession.” He said, “You can’t think that way! If you do, you’ll almost guarantee that’s what’ll happen. When I get the rockets, I think to myself, ‘I’m just gonna blow right through this guy!’ You have to be confident or else you have no chance.” Then he recommended a book called Mind Gym by Gary Mack, which I immediately bought and read. That was one of the major “eureka” moments in my life. Of course blowing yourself up by accident with the rocket launcher in a video game doesn’t matter too much, but the parallels between that and choking during a recital are inescapable. The lessons I learned from Tsquared and Gary Mack will carry over into my professional career as an organist.

Around that time I was also discovering NLP. I read a few books on that and took a course in Ericksonian Hypnosis down at the NLP Center of New York. I also started listening to self-hypnosis CDs from people like Graham English and Paul McKenna on breaking up negative thought patterns (such as focusing on what could go wrong instead of visualizing what will go right) and developing confidence. Of course, hypnosis is something I could do without the use of my hands, so the last 20 months have been the perfect opportunity to work on that aspect. I’ve already been able to help others a little bit with it, and I’m confident it will be a major asset when I begin playing in public again.

So all in all, what could have been a total loss over the last year and a half was turned into a significant positive. I not only didn’t lose ground in my keyboard skills, but I actually made improvements to my sight reading, composing, and theoretical understanding of music. And I also made real progress in another weak area of my music making, performance psychology. You can practice till you’re blue in the face, but if you choke during public performance, it does no good. Being able to deal with performance anxiety is crucial to being able to function as a musician. Plus I’ll just be able to enjoy life more if I’m not dreading every time I have to play under pressure. :-)

New Behavior Generator

June 19th, 2008

Here is an NLP technique I learned a while back that I have found very useful and extremely effective. It’s called the New Behavior Generator, and it’s something you can use to help you get motivated for something that you’d like to get done but don’t necessarily feel like doing.

1. Find a comfortable place to relax before beginning. Gaze off to your right and imagine seeing an “other you.” This “other you” will be the one learning this new behavior. Sometimes it’s helpful to imagine this other you in a bubble or on the other side of a glass wall to help you separate the “other you” from yourself.

2. Choose something you want to get done but don’t really feel like getting motivated to do. Something like balancing your checkbook or getting up early to exercise.

3. Imagine this “other you” enjoying the benefits of having done the activity. For example, imagine that “other you” feeling relieved at not having the an unbalanced checkbook hanging over your head or feeling invigorated and ready to start the day full of energy after exercising in the morning. Really make the images in your head vivid and compelling and specific.

4. Now imagine that “other you” actually doing the activity. Imagine him feeling motivated by everything you did in step 3, in other words feeling motivated by the benefits of the end result.

5. Next, step into that “other you” so that you’re experiencing the world through their eyes, ears, and other senses. And now experiencing everything from this 1st person perspective, repeat steps 3 and 4, and notice how good it will feel after having done the activity (i.e. balancing checkbook, etc.).

6. Finally, think of the next specific time you’ll be doing this action (for example, getting up tomorrow morning to exercise), and see yourself doing it easily and feeling super motivated.

I’ve used this exercise many times and had great success with it. For example, on my recent trip to New York and DC/northern Virginia, I wanted to get up at 6:45 to work out before starting our day. I did this exercise the night before shortly before bed, and without an alarm clock, I woke up at exactly 6:42 and bounced out of bed feeling super motivated to go do the elliptical machine for an hour. This is incredibly powerful and useful. I hope some other people find it as beneficial as I have.

(I learned this technique in the excellent book NLP: The New Technology of Achievement by Steve Andreas and Charles Faulkner.)

Thanks to my mom for helping me get this typed up.